AMSTERDAM — A Dutch writer has mentioned that it’s going to now not publish a best-selling ebook, “The Betrayal of Anne Frank,” which claimed to establish the informant who alerted Nazi police to the teenage diarist’s hiding place, due to doubts about its conclusions.
The writer, Ambo Anthos, which launched the Dutch translation of the ebook by the creator Rosemary Sullivan in January, mentioned on Tuesday that it might halt publication in response to a “refutation” by 5 distinguished Dutch historians that referred to as the findings into query.
“Primarily based on the conclusions of this report, we now have determined that, efficient instantly, the ebook will now not be obtainable,” Ambo Anthos, which had apologized for the ebook final month, wrote in a statement on its web site. “We’ll name upon bookstores to return their inventory.”
“The Betrayal of Anne Frank” acquired worldwide consideration in January after a self-described “chilly case staff” led by a retired F.B.I. investigator whose work shaped the premise for the ebook was featured on the CBS Information program “60 Minutes.”
The staff accused Arnold van den Bergh, a Dutch Jewish notary, of pointing the Nazi police to the handle of Prinsengracht 263, the situation of the key annex in Amsterdam the place the Frank household and 4 different Jews had been hiding for 2 years.
Historians and different consultants on World Battle II and the Holocaust in a short time expressed doubts concerning the discovering, questioning a central premise of its argument: that the notary had lists of Jewish hiding locations that have been compiled by the Amsterdam Jewish Council, a corporation the occupying Nazis had arrange in 1941.
Pieter van Twisk, the lead researcher for the cold-case undertaking, mentioned in an interview with The New York Occasions on the time that the proof for the lists was “circumstantial, however circumstantial proof continues to be proof.”
On Tuesday evening, Bart Pockets, a professor of Jewish Research on the College of Amsterdam, summarized the findings of the refutation, written by Raymund Schütz, an professional on Dutch notaries through the German occupation; two consultants on the Amsterdam Jewish Council, Laurien Vastenhout and Bart van der Increase; and two different researchers, Petra van den Boomgaard and Aaldrik Hermans.
“We felt we needed to step in as a result of we owed it to our self-discipline,” Professor Pockets mentioned. “For such a declare to be made,” he added, the historic context “needed to be stable as a rock.” However he mentioned, this was “not the case, in no way.”
“It’s clear that the argumentation doesn’t maintain up,” he concluded. “Because of misinterpretation and tunnel imaginative and prescient, the investigation wrongly identifies Arnold van den Bergh as Anne Frank’s betrayer.”
Mirjam de Gorter, granddaughter of Arnold van den Bergh, had made an emotional public attraction to HarperCollins at an event where the report was released, asking that the writer situation a retraction and stop publication.
She mentioned that she had repeatedly knowledgeable the investigators and the creator of the situation the place her grandfather and his household have been in the summertime of 1944, when Anne Frank was betrayed. They ignored her, she mentioned, and claimed that Mr. van den Bergh had gained his freedom by giving up addresses to the Nazis.
“My grandfather, Arnold van den Bergh, has been portrayed worldwide as a global scapegoat,” she mentioned. “In the meantime, Anne Frank’s worldwide prominence is exploited in a very dishonest approach.”
Ambo Anthos had beforehand paused printing and distribution of the ebook. “A extra essential stance may have been taken right here,” wrote Tanja Hendriks, writer and director of the corporate. Ms. Hendriks didn’t reply to requests for touch upon Wednesday.
The writer’s web site now states, “We might as soon as once more like to supply our honest apologies to everybody who has been offended by the contents of this ebook.”
Mr. van Twisk, Ms. Sullivan and the documentary filmmaker Thijs Bayens, who was a member of the staff that was assembled to establish Anne Franks’s betrayer, additionally didn’t reply to a number of requests for remark. The cold-case staff’s lead investigator, the previous F.B.I. detective, Vince Pankoke, has beforehand issued a defense of the work, nonetheless.
“Till now, we now have not been introduced with any piece of proof or any new info that had sufficient energy to problem our conclusion,” he famous earlier than the refutation was launched. “The van den Bergh situation is, in our opinion, nonetheless essentially the most viable idea concerning the betrayal of the Prinsengracht 263.”
HarperCollins U.S., which launched the ebook on Jan. 17 with plans to publish it in additional than 20 languages, has thus far supplied no response to the criticisms.