US court moves extradition hearing of 26/11 accused Tahawwur Rana to June 24

A US courtroom has postponed the in-person extradition listening to of Pakistani-origin Canadian businessman Tahawwur Rana, who’s seemed for his involvement inside the 2008 Mumbai terror assault, from April 22 to June 24.

US District Court docket Decide in Los Angeles Jacqueline Chooljian in her order on Monday moved the in-person extradition listening to of 59-year-old Rana to India to June 24.

The courtroom’s order obtained right here after a conference between Rana’s attorneys and folks representing the US Authorities. In the course of the conference, the two sides agreed to take care of the in-person listening to of Rana on June 24 at 1.30 pm native Los Angeles time.

In the meantime, Rana’s attorneys in additional motion opposed his extradition to India.

“The federal government has not recognized a single case for the reason that founding of this nation wherein an individual acquitted by an American jury has been extradited to a overseas nation for trial on expenses resting on the identical conduct,” it acknowledged in its 17-page new submission on Monday.

The US Authorities has time till April 12 to submit its response, if any. The US Authorities so far has supported the extradition of Rana to India.

Rana’s authorized skilled argued that the US authorities’s place boils all the way down to this: the time interval “offense” inside the India-US Extradition Treaty means irrespective of the federal authorities needs it to indicate.

In Article 2, the dual criminality provision, the place the federal authorities needs the time interval to have a broad meaning, it refers to underlying conduct. In Article 6, it means “conduct” when wished to acquire a plea deal with Headley, and it means “parts” when wished to extradite Rana.

“The Court docket ought to reject this “heads the federal government wins, tails Rana loses” method. Making use of peculiar instruments of interpretation, it ought to maintain that the time period “offense” in Article 6 refers back to the underlying conduct, and it ought to deny extradition,” it argued.

Rana, a childhood buddy of David (*24*) Headley, was re-arrested on June 10 in Los Angeles on an extradition request by India for his involvement inside the Mumbai terror assault whereby 166 people, along with six Individuals, have been killed. He has been declared a fugitive by India.

Pakistani-American Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) terrorist Headley was involved in plotting the 2008 Mumbai terror assault. He was made an approver inside the case, and is in the mean time serving a 35-year jail time interval inside the US for his place inside the assault.

As per the India-US Extradition Treaty, the Indian authorities has requested the formal extradition of Rana, and the USA has initiated this extradition persevering with. The US Authorities has argued that Rana meets all of the requirements warranting certification of his extradition to India.

These are: the courtroom has every private and materials jurisdiction, there could also be an extradition treaty between the USA and India that’s in full strain and influence, and the crimes for which Rana’s extradition is sought are lined by the phrases of the treaty.

In his earlier courtroom submission on February 4, Rana’s authorized skilled had argued that Rana’s extradition is barred under Article 6 of the United States-India extradition treaty on account of he had beforehand been acquitted of the offences for which his extradition is sought, and under Article 9 of the treaty on account of the federal authorities has not established attainable set off to contemplate that Rana devoted the alleged offences.

Show More

Related Articles

Back to top button