JERUSALEM — The slow-burning corruption trial of Benjamin Netanyahu shifted again into Israeli public consciousness on Monday with the primary look of a state witness essential to the prosecution of the previous chief, Israel’s longest-serving prime minister.
The witness, Nir Hefetz, a one-time authorities spokesman and later a trusted aide to the Netanyahu household, testified about his function within the relationship between Mr. Netanyahu and the house owners of a significant information web site and telecommunications firm whereas he was in energy. The prosecution’s case hangs on proving that the house owners on the time, Shaul and Iris Elovitch, routinely allowed Mr. Netanyahu’s household to affect their web site’s political protection in trade for profitable regulatory advantages offered by him.
Mr. Netanyahu has pleaded not responsible to the costs. But when such an trade passed off, Mr. Hefetz would have been in a direct place to know. Because the Netanyahu household’s mouthpiece from 2014, Mr. Hefetz was an innermost member of the Israeli chief’s circle, earlier than turning on the household in 2018 by signing a state witness cope with the prosecution.
From early 2015, in response to the indictment, Mr. Hefetz was the principal conduit between the household, the Elovitchs and the editors at Walla, the information web site — making him a doubtlessly damning witness.
Mr. Hefetz’s look is a reminder of the relevance of a trial that was, till Mr. Netanyahu misplaced energy in June, on the coronary heart of a constitutional disaster that elevated considerations concerning the well being of Israeli democracy and the legitimacy of Mr. Netanyahu as prime minister. The trial contributed to a political stalemate that led to 4 elections in two years.
In contrast to earlier leaders accused of corruption, Mr. Netanyahu refused to step down after having been indicted in 2019, as an alternative presenting himself because the sufferer of a biased judicial system. In doing so, he was accused of getting created a dangerous showdown between the manager and the judiciary branches that undermined public belief.
His intransigence additionally raised questions on whether or not the trial would diminish his power to control successfully, or if he may use his place to affect the end result — for instance, by changing the lawyer basic with somebody extra more likely to abandon the prosecution.
The case contributed to a break up amongst Mr. Netanyahu’s right-wing political alliance, main some former colleagues to kind a rival coalition with centrists and leftists that pressured him from workplace in June.
His departure from energy diminished the gravity of a few of these questions, whereas the granular and technical testimony by earlier witnesses made proceedings tough to comply with.
The centrality of Mr. Hefetz to the prosecution’s case, and the uncommon window he affords onto Mr. Netanyahu’s life, has given the trial added power, in response to spectators within the cramped courtroom who’ve attended because the begin.
“The earlier witnesses weren’t straight linked to Netanyahu,” mentioned Tamar Almog, authorized affairs correspondent for Kan, the Israeli public broadcaster. “They couldn’t testify as to what Netanyahu needed, meant or knew — whereas Hefetz’s testimony is supposed to make clear Netanyahu’s intentions and actions.”
Mr. Hefetz’s testimony will seemingly final weeks if not months, however already on Monday he had begun to throw gentle onto Mr. Netanyahu’s internal life.
Together with his former boss sitting a couple of yards away, Mr. Hefetz informed the courtroom that Mr. Netanyahu had been an extreme “management freak” concerning media protection, and that he had spent as a lot time on that as on safety affairs, “together with on issues an outsider would contemplate to be nonsense.”
Mr. Netanyahu was so punctilious, Mr. Hefetz mentioned, that “you possibly can’t get a punctuation mark out with out his authorization.”
Mr. Hefetz recalled having acted as a message courier between the Elovitchs and Netanyahus, significantly throughout the buildup to a basic election in 2015. Mr. Hefetz mentioned he had relayed requests from Mr. Elovitch during which he requested Mr. Netanyahu to safe a good regulatory setting for a merger between two firms part-owned by the Elovitchs.
Amongst different requests, the witness mentioned, Mr. Elovitch had steered that Mr. Netanyahu assume private accountability for the Communications Ministry, which was overseeing the merger.
The indictment lists greater than 300 incidences of calls for made by the Netanyahus for particular adjustments to protection on the Elovitchs’ information web site between 2013 and 2016 — calls for that have been primarily delivered by Mr. Hefetz.
“Netanyahu had the best management over the Walla web site, together with what the headline can be, the place it might be on the house web page,” Mr. Hefetz mentioned.
The calls for, he mentioned, reached fever pitch within the run-up to the 2015 election, with a number of requests per day, and ranged from what seemed to be grave political intervention to extra frivolous issues.
On Election Day itself, Mr. Hefetz mentioned, he had conveyed a requirement for the Walla web site to put on its house web page a now-notorious video during which Mr. Netanyahu rallied his base by expressing alarm that right-wing rule was in peril as a result of Arab voters have been “being bused to the polling stations in droves” by left-wing organizations. Denounced as racist, Mr. Netanyahu later apologized for the remarks, which he had additionally posted on his Fb web page.
Mr. Hefetz was assigned a couple of weeks later with conveying a requirement for protection of Yair Netanyahu, the prime minister’s elder son, and his new girlfriend, which, in response to the indictment, “included a request to dispatch a paparazzi photographer.”
As a part of the internal sanctum, Mr. Hefetz additionally appeared to have performed a task in making an attempt to impede justice. In December 2016, the indictment acknowledged, as studies have been rising about an investigation into Mr. Netanyahu’s relationship with Mr. Elovitch, Mr. Hefetz requested an pressing assembly with the Elovitchs and expressed fear concerning the cellphone correspondence between them. All of them agreed to get new telephones and to “disappear” the outdated ones.
A lot of the telephones disappeared, in response to Micha Fettman, a lawyer who was previously on Mr. Netanyahu’s protection crew. Mr. Hefetz’s cellphone was “stolen” whereas the Elovitchs’ telephones “fell into the pool or received eaten by a canine” or have been upgraded to new ones, Mr. Fettman mentioned on Israeli tv final week.
Many commentators mentioned the brand new revelations, whereas juicy, have been unlikely to change Israeli public perceptions of Mr. Netanyahu, since most individuals already had shaped a place.
A plea deal may power Mr. Netanyahu to depart politics, whereas a responsible verdict may imply jail time for him. However because the trial proceeds, it’s unlikely to affect how Israelis vote, mentioned Nahum Barnea, a columnist for Yediot Ahronoth, a centrist newspaper.
“It’s like Trump — folks have already got an opinion concerning the man,” Mr. Barnea mentioned. “It doesn’t have an effect on the general public pulse.”
Myra Noveck contributed reporting.